[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re Coherent Brain Oscillations
- To: Multiple recipients of list CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL <CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL@LISTSERV.UMU.SE>
- Subject: Re Coherent Brain Oscillations
- From: John Shaw <crosley@TCP.CO.UK>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 06:31:16 PST
- Reply-To: Professional discussions of neurophysiology <CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL@LISTSERV.UMU.SE>
- Sender: Professional discussions of neurophysiology <CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL@LISTSERV.UMU.SE>
Jim Newman has an interesting analogy relevant to my
posting:
We are all familiar with the rolling pattern of
boiling water. But if we trace the activity of a
single water molecule as it breaks into its
component pieces, we don't find a rolling pattern;
we find random motions. If we trace the individual
activity of many water molecules, we still only
find lots of individual random patterns. So where
does the rolling pattern come from? Answer:
tracing the motion of individual atoms and
molecules is looking at the wrong level of
analysis for rolling. One needs to look at the
cumulative effects of all the water at the same
time. The only way to do this is to is to look at
the water at a higher level of description and
describe the motion at that level. the problem of
where rolling patterns come from disappears at the
higher level, for it is just the pattern that
emerges when water boils. Maybe binding works in
the same way.
See web site for the Journal of Consciousness Studies at
www.zynet.co.uk/imprint; The binding problem; Jim
Newman: Reticular-Thalamic Activation in the Cortex.
Of course this does not help Dr. Goldberg's query -
apologies to him. John Shaw
-------------------------------------
Name: John C Shaw
E-mail: crosley@tcp.co.uk
Date: 03/17/98
Time: 06:31:16
This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------