[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OAE and BAER
- To: Multiple recipients of list CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL <CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL@LISTSERV.UMU.SE>
- Subject: Re: OAE and BAER
- From: Juan Barios Heredero <JBARIOSH@NEXO.ES>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 01:33:54 +0100
- Comments: To: "Daniel M. Schwartz" <schwartzd@surgmon.com>
- References: <01bcfc22$5172d8e0$eae6040a@ws4>
- Reply-To: Professional discussions of neurophysiology <CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL@LISTSERV.UMU.SE>
- Sender: Professional discussions of neurophysiology <CLIN_NEUROPHYSIOL@LISTSERV.UMU.SE>
Daniel M. Schwartz wrote:
> The object of BAER screening is quite simple, is there a wave V at a
> sufficiently low
> intensity level to r/o marked hearing loss. That level is 40 dB nHL.
> If
> there is a wave V at this level they pass, if not they fail and are
> then
> referred for complete evaluation in the lab not the nursery.
Hi, I am a spanish clinical neurophysiologist. I usually work every
day on EMG and evoked potentials, and we usually receive children for
BAER screening. My questions are:
Everybody at list think that presence of wave V at 40 dB nHL is
enough to reject a hearing loss suspect?
Can anybody be polite and send an easy and FAST protocol to evaluate
hearing loss in children? (or be very, very polite and send two: one for
ICU and one for BAER laboratory)
Thanks in advance.